Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology

Volume  18, Issue 2, Jan-June 2025, Pages 119-124
 

Original Article

Correlation and Examination of the Predominant Palatal Arch form within the Male and Female between North Indian and Negroid Population

Ishika Bhardwaj1, Sally Lukose2, M. Siddharth3

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Forensic Science, School of Allied Health Sciences, Sharda University, Greater   Noida 201310, Uttar Pradesh, India.   2 Professor, Department of Forensic Science, School of Allied Health Sciences, Sharda University, Greater Noida  201310, Uttar Pradesh, India.   3 Professor, Department of Periodontology, School of Dental Sciences, Sharda University, Greater Noida 201310, Uttar   Pradesh, India.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: 10.21088/ijfmp.0974.3383.18225.5

Abstract

Background: Palatal rugoscopy is the examination of the palatal rugae. The majority of people concur that a person’s rugae pattern remains constant throughout their lives. The rugae pattern can endure injury or burns better than most other anatomical structures because of their interior placement in the head. Because rugae patterns are believed to be unique, much like fingerprints, they are also utilised for personal identification. Examining and correlating the dominant palatal arch form with the male and female groups in North Indian and Negroid populations was the aim of this study. The sample consists of 80 plaster casts, ages 18 to 25, split equally across two groups and genders. Method: After taking an impression of the maxillary arch, a plaster cast was made using alginate impression material. The rugae were recognised on the cast and described in accordance with Thomas and Kotze (1983) and Kapali et al. (1983) using a sharp graphite pencil and adequate illumination and magnification Result: Class B (V-shaped palate) was the most common palatal arch form (16/40; 40.00%) in Negroid subjects, followed by Class C shape. In Indian subjects, Class C (U-shaped palate) was the most common palatal arch form (19/40; 47.50%), followed by Class A and Class B shapes.Conclusion: The rugae pattern is another method of distinguishing between North Indian and Negroid, based on the limitations of the current study.
 


Keywords : • Rugae patterns • Forensic Identification and Palatal rugae • Orthodontics • Palatoscopy and Forensic dentistry • Palatal arch form
Corresponding Author : Sally Lukose