Full Text (PDF)
Original Article

Thecoperitoneal Shunt: Indications and Complications

S. Dhanasekaran, S. Devanand Senthil Kumar

Author Information

Licence:
Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. CC BY-NC includes the following elements:

 BY: credit must be given to the creator.
 NC: Only noncommercial uses of the work are permitted.



International Journal of Neurology and Neurosurgery 16(3-4):p 43-50, 2024-12-31. | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijnns.0975.0223.163424.1
How Cite This Article:
S. Dhanasekaran, S. Devanand Senthil Kumar, Thecoperitoneal Shunt: Indications and Complications. International Journal of Neurology and Neurosurgery. 2024;16(3-4):43-50.

Received : October 21, 2024         Accepted : November 15, 2024          Published : December 31, 2024

Abstract

Background: Thecoperitoneal shunt (TPS) is a method of diverting cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), similar to the ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS). While VPS is a common and widely used procedure for hydrocephalus, TPS is less frequently practiced due to limited data on its indications and complications. Patients and Methods: In this study, we retrospectively reviewed our experience with TPS and its indications and complications, in 17 patients operated on from January 2021 to December 2023, with at least six months of follow-up. We analyzed the patients’ clinical data, indications, imaging studies, and complications. Results: Seventeen patients underwent TPS in our institute. The common indications were idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH), normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH), cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) with vision loss, pseudomeningocele, and CSF leak from the surgical site. The mean follow-up period was 1.2 years. Common complications included shunt overdrainage with subdural collection, shunt infection, shunt blockage, and shunt disconnection. A literature review revealed various other indications and complications. Conclusion: TPS is an effective and favorable treatment modality for various conditions and demonstrates good clinical outcomes. The encountered complications can be managed effectively and may be reduced with additional precautions and strategies.


References
  • 1.   Foo NP, Tun YC, Chang CC, Lin HL, Cheng CH, Chuang HY. Clinical Outcome and Safety of Lumboperitoneal Shunt in the Treatment of Non-Obstructive Hydrocephalus. Clin Interv Aging. 2023;18:477-483 ttps://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S401116
  • 2.   Aoki N. Lumboperitoneal shunt: clinical applications, complications, and comparison with ventriculoperitoneal shunt. Neurosurgery. 1990 Jun;26(6):998-1003; discussion 1003-4. PMID: 2362678.
  • 3.   Phalak, Manoj & Agrawal, Deepak &Dawar, Pankaj &Kothiwala, Anil & Singh, Pankaj & Sharma,
  • 4.   Le H, Yamini B, Frim DM. Lumboperitoneal shunting as a treatment for slit ventricle syndrome. PediatrNeurosurg. 2002 Apr;36(4):178-82. doi: 10.1159/000056054. PMID: 12006752. \
  • 7.   Robertson WC Jr, Gomez MR. External hydrocephalus. Early finding in congenital communicating hydrocephalus. Arch Neurol. 1978 Aug;35(8):541-4. doi: 10.1001/ archneur.1978.00500320061014. PMID: 666616.
  • 8.   Yang TH, Chang CS, Sung WW, Liu JT. Lumboperitoneal Shunt: A New Modified Surgical Technique and a Comparison of the Complications with Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt in a Single Center. Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 Sep 26;55(10):643. doi: 10.3390/medicina55100643. PMID: 31561485; PMCID: PMC6843463.
  • 9.   Alawamry, A., Youssef, E.M., Morsy, A.A. et al. Laparoscopic-assisted intraperitoneal placement of lumboperitoneal shunt in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Egypt J Neurosurg 38, 4 2023). ttps://doi.org/10.1186/s41984-022-00184-8
  • 10.   Arumalla, Kirit& Mohammed, Naseer & Bhat, Dhananjaya & Shukla, Dhaval & Bhagavatula, Indira. (2023). Thecoperitoneal Shunts—Our 20 Years Experience. Indian Journal of Neurosurgery. 12. 10.1055/s-0042-1758777.
  • 11.   Reddy TA, Seshagiri DV, Reddy HK, Patwardhan AA, Joshi TH, Shukla D, et al. Surgical Management of Vision Loss in Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: Case Series from a Tertiary Care Stroke Center. Ann Indian AcadNeurol 2023;26:733–41
  • 18.   Nadkarni, T. D., Rekate, H. L., & Wallace, D. (2008). Concurrent use of a lumboperitoneal shunt with programmable valve and ventricular access device in the treatment of pseudotumor cerebri: review of 40 cases. Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics PED, 2(1), 19-24. https://doi.org/10.3171/ PED/2008/2/7/019
  • 20.   Ibrahim A. Alhalal, Hashem T. Al-Salman, Abdulrahman H. Al Anazi. Bilateral sixth cranial nerve palsy following lumboperitoneal shunt. Neurosciences Journal Jul 2022, 27 (3) 187-190; DOI: 10.17712/nsj.2022.3.20210140
  • 23.   Dembla, Saurabh R.. Migration of a Thecoperitoneal Shunt into the Bladder with Calculus Formation. Neurology India 70(5):p 2281-2282, Sep–Oct 2022. | DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.359221
  • 24.   Yadav YR, Pande S, Raina VK, Singh M. Lumboperitoneal shunts: review of 409 cases. Neurol India 2004;52(02):188–190
  • 25.   Tanaka T, Goto H, Momozaki N, Honda E. Incidence of radiculopathy following lumboperitoneal shunt placement without fluoroscopy for normal pressure hydrocephalus. SurgNeurol Int. 2022 Sep 23;13:437. doi: 10.25259/SNI_791_2022. PMID: 36324979; PMCID: PMC9610451.
  • 26.   Tanaka T, Goto H, Momozaki N, Honda E. Creating of “fascial sheath” around subcutaneous lumboperitoneal shunt catheters largely prevents postoperative subcutaneous shunt catheter migration. SurgNeurol Int. 2022 Nov 11;13:528. doi: 10.25259/SNI_978_2022. PMID: 36447847; PMCID: PMC9699832.
  • 27.   McMaster M, Carey R. The lumbar theco-peritoneal shunt syndrome and its surgical management. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985;67-B(2):198-203. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.67B2.3980525
  • 28.   A late and extreme complication of lumboperitoneal shunt. Vural, Murat et al. The Spine Journal, Volume 15, Issue 5, e7 - e12

Funding


Author Information

Authors and Affiliatione

  • S. Dhanasekaran
    Institute of Neurosurgery, Madras Medical College and Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu,, India
  • S. Devanand Senthil Kumar
    Institute of Neurosurgery, Madras Medical College and Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital, Chennai Tamil Nadu,, India

Conflicts of Interest

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the supplementary material.


Rights and Permissions



About this article


Cite this article

S. Dhanasekaran, S. Devanand Senthil Kumar, Thecoperitoneal Shunt: Indications and Complications. International Journal of Neurology and Neurosurgery. 2024;16(3-4):43-50.


Licence:
Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. CC BY-NC includes the following elements:

 BY: credit must be given to the creator.
 NC: Only noncommercial uses of the work are permitted.



Download citation

Received Accepted Published
October 21, 2024 November 15, 2024 December 31, 2024
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijnns.0975.0223.163424.1
Keywords hecoperitoneal shuntLumboperitoneal shuntVentriculoperitoneal shuntidiopathic intracranial hypertensionnormal pressure hydrocephaluscerebral venous thrombosispseudomeningoceleCSF leak

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Saturday 07 June 2025, 20:44:32 (IST)


7

Accesses

00
0
00

Citations


22
11
23

View full article metrics including social shares, article views and publishing history


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received October 21, 2024
Accepted November 15, 2024
Published December 31, 2024

licence


Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. CC BY-NC includes the following elements:

 BY: credit must be given to the creator.
 NC: Only noncommercial uses of the work are permitted.



Access this article

Open access


Share